2012 production jurnals

we are thinign of douin sveral things one is a horro scene other one is a documentary or a film of a fuotbal fan or a song clip.

the x files

1 – fade- in -medium shot from the back of the secretary into the office of Steve Nelson

The office of Mr Nelson. One of the best indi lawyers in New York. The secretary is leaned on the desk of Mr. Nelson, behind Mr Nelson is a big chimney with a long and tall picture on the back and two windows on the side of this chimney one on the right, and another one on the left, crossing the street in front of the window there is a market and big building. The office is set in downtown New York.

Camera pulls back to:

2 – Interior office. Mr. Nelson is sat down on his big chair with a double breasted jacket and his hair pulled back. The secretary is talking to him about a client . suddenly the phones rings.

Mr. Nelson:

Can you answer the phone darling?

Darling:

Shore, Mr. Nelson

-Picks up the phone

Darling:

Mr. Nelson’s office how I can help you, oh hallows, Mr. Smith, fine thank you. Let me check if his in. is Mr. Smith, he wants to know how the trials going. Do you want to get it?

Mr. Nelson:

Pass him fro. Darling. Mr. Smith what can I do for you. Of course will divide the assets. And you are keeping the house. Now you are not keeping custody of the kids, because she is not the one ho was discovered with a playboy doll.

-The secretary still in the office making up his nails, she stands up picks a glass and serve whisky to Mr. nelson. He hangs up the phone.

Mr. Nelson:

Thank you darling shore needed this.

Darling:

Of course you did. Would you need something else?

Mr. Nelson:

No. its okay. You are a doll

Character Representation - Brad Pitt

The "new" masculinity, represented by Brad Pitt, differs from the old one in the sense that it is based on esthetics and physical appareances. It presents a blond, pretty looking young man who has an equally attractive girl, a modern camera and a car. The image portrayed is one of a sexual man, compared to the traditional man figure of the Malboro Man: a tough, rural person, who represents strenght and freedom in the sense of the open realtionship with nature. Instead, this modern model illustrates a more idealized, fashionable stereotype of masculinity, appealing for a more comercial trend.

SEVEN

Elements of Film Noir:

Setting: Unknown city, dirty like, decayed setting. It is always raining.

Sound: Diagetic street scream, noises always present, as well as the rain. They are emphazised.

Characters: Officers do not care about their work, uninterested police force.

Lighting: Heavy use of shades and low lighting. No artificial light except the flashlights and television. Natural Ambient lights

Sound 2: Non=diagetic: music, heavy use of low key chords, violing low.

Inclusion of gore, crudety

in this screen shot we can se the diference between light an dark how the light even in a flash light conve3ys in a way were it shows the diference of the decay in the city also show how the city is lost and a little bit of ligth can shows the path "squiarooscuro"

3week of production

in our third week of productions we had some bits of misscomunication issues , and wasted some days thaa w can do editing nds stuff on doing something wasent esential on our film documentary, we spend several days with our editor conteinnign all the information on his Mac , and oen day he camed with the documentary all redy editited, no transiciptions not consolting to the grup, just he edited as he wished to, whn our executive porducer asked us to do the transcriptons i propused to do all of them ir the editor passed me the files hi forgot and still i dont have the files i dont have the transcriptions.
however the final version of our documentary needs some poishing i still think that if the editor woud asked us for our opinon, still allot of work to do thankfully he showed us this rugght cut we all give our ideas and im prety sure its gona impruve

Mokumentary

This documentary had no sense at all, all doe its technical aspects were not that bad, this documentary had a very good topic which could been spend widely, but instead of that they used low resources interview and they needed to have more research about it like for example, why he was doing it and stuff like that.
There are too many people talking in a 4 minutes and 23 seconds space which makes it a little bit interesting boring, also I think the plot of the story was very poor, if they would do it as deforestation or recycling, but a dude who likes to leave in trees would not be interesting

Also the evaluation of their own documentary and the story board part and the descriptions on why and what were just the deal for the documentary I so the same things but in a negative way, this is because a director or any one cant criticize their own work, but they are the best on criticize others, also this makes my mind clear on wy some things on the dcumentary were like they were, for example shots and imigee issues

Mokumentary

This documentary had no sense at all, all doe its technical aspects were not that bad, this documentary had a very good topic which could been spend widely, but instead of that they used low resources interview and they needed to have more research about it like for example, why he was doing it and stuff like that.
There are too many people talking in a 4 minutes and 23 seconds space which makes it a little bit interesting boring, also I think the plot of the story was very poor, if they would do it as deforestation or recycling, but a dude who likes to leave in trees would not be interesting.